The Legal Examiner Mark The Legal Examiner Mark The Legal Examiner Mark search twitter facebook feed linkedin instagram google-plus avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close
Skip to main content

The Congressional Budget Office has determined that limiting the rights of malpractice victims would only result in three tenths of one percent savings in medical cost. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-malpractice10-2009oct10,0,4877440.story

Is that small saving worth sacrificing a fundamental American value? The overwhelming majority of malpractice verdicts are based upon “never events” – medical errors which the Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation say are inexcusable. http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/release.cfm?ID=2920. These errors include operating on the wrong limb, leaving a sponge or medical instrument in the patient following surgery, leaving an incapacitated patient unattended, prescribing or administering the wrong medication. These are not matters of defensive medicine but rather simple negligence.

Our system of justice strives to make the one who caused the injury responsible for the consequences. Forcing the victim of a “never event” to shoulder a major portion of the loss would slightly reduce the cost of medical care but it would violate our dedication to personal responsibility.

One Comment

  1. Great article Pete! The article from Joanne Doroshow of the Center for Justice & Democracy is also excellent. www.thepoptort.com/.../-center-for-justice-democracy-critiques-cbo-analysis-of-medical-malpractice-costs-.html

    It shows that the headline doesn't match the data in the CBO report.

Comments are closed.

Of Interest