09252017Headline:

Mobile, Alabama

HomeAlabamaMobile

Email Clay Rossi
Clay Rossi
Clay Rossi
Attorney • (800) 574-4332

Shot Blocking Justice

1 comment

You likely didn’t know that the Japanese government has concerns that two popular HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccines, Merck’s Gardasil and GlaxoSmithKline ‘s Cervarix, can cause very severe side-effects including long-term pain and numbness, infertility, and paralysis. If the Japanese can ultimately show that the vaccine is dangerous, what does that mean for litigation in the Untied States where millions of young girls have received the shot? It will not be the litigation avalanche that you suspect.

471px-Hypodermic-needle_(PSF)

Chances are that you might not be familiar with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 which created the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims otherwise known as the “Vaccine court.” In essence, the Vaccine court was created to shield vaccine manufacturers from federal and state court litigation.

While the Vaccine court has, on occasion, made sizeable awards to children injured from vaccines, the structure of the court is “a no-fault compensation scheme” which gives cover for Big Pharma to disclaim that theirs vaccines are actually dangerous.

As for Gardasil, the Vaccine court has already paid out almost $6 million in claims concerning that drug (including two claims which resulted in death). The Vaccine court has also awarded $20 million in cases for vaccine-induced autism – something the drug giants tell us is just a medical fairytale. Likewise, the court has handed out numerous awards for flu shots that have caused Guillain-Barre Syndrome and even death.

In 2011, the Supreme Court upheld the Vaccine court system when challenged, holding that it “reflects a sensible choice to leave complex epidemiological judgments about vaccine design to the FDA and the National Vaccine Program rather than juries.” Put another way, “we think juries are too stupid to figure out if vaccines are really injuring or killing kids.”

Rather than the protection of a Vaccine court, which does little to incentivize the creation of the safest vaccines possible, we need vaccines to be subject to the same jury trial scrutiny that other scientific and medical cases are.

1 Comment

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  1. Keith Peevy says:
    up arrow

    I have to respectfully disagree. For instance: the autism awards were almost certainly jury error based on fraudulent science that has since been exposed–not the fault of a pharmaceutical company. Another: while flu vaccines are rarely associated with Guillain-Barre, death from flu in the unimmunized would be signficant and not rare, especially among the elderly and those with chronic lung issues. The net effect is to save thousands of lives.
    While every system is flawed, the FDA should bear the heat for vaccines making it to market without proper vetting as safe–the pharms cannot put them on the market if they have not jumped through the FDA hoops–they are the gate keeper. The autism cases are evidence against your argument, as are the flu/GB cases.